Labour
has always been the driving force for constitutional reform and democratic
advance, from Kier Hardie’s support of the suffragettes, to the Attlee Government’s abolition of plural voting with the removal of the property based
business vote and university constituencies in 1948.
Prior to that, businessmen who were also graduates had as many as three votes.
In 1969 it was a Labour Government, which lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.
In 1975, it was a Labour Government that, in the teeth of strong Tory opposition, granted the British people the right to determine their future in or out of Europe with the first UK wide referendum on EEC membership.
It was, of course, a Tory Government which took Britain into the EEC without a referendum.
Prior to that, businessmen who were also graduates had as many as three votes.
In 1969 it was a Labour Government, which lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.
In 1975, it was a Labour Government that, in the teeth of strong Tory opposition, granted the British people the right to determine their future in or out of Europe with the first UK wide referendum on EEC membership.
It was, of course, a Tory Government which took Britain into the EEC without a referendum.
Since
then there have been nine further national and regional referendums, eight on
devolution issues, three in Wales, two in Scotland and one each in Northern
Ireland, the North East and Greater London, together with the UK-wide referendum on the
Alternative Vote (AV) in 2011.
In
addition, under the Blair Government there were 37 local referendums
on the constitutional arrangements for local government (elected mayors, etc).
Indeed,
until now only twice has a Tory Government supported a referendum, once in 1973
on the constitution position of Northern Ireland, and the second time in 2011 on
the Alternative Vote, but that was only conceded as part of the Coalition Agreement.
Historically,
it was always Labour that championed the right of the British people to
determine constitutional issues, just as it was Labour that was historically
opposed to the EEC, which has now morphed into a neoliberal concept known as
the EU.
It is difficult to understand why the party opposed the EEC on the grounds that it was a ‘capitalist club’ yet know embraces the EU, which really does enshrine neoliberalism into law: read the Single European Act.
It is difficult to understand why the party opposed the EEC on the grounds that it was a ‘capitalist club’ yet know embraces the EU, which really does enshrine neoliberalism into law: read the Single European Act.
The EU is
now embarking on secret negotiations known as the Transanlantic Trade and
Investment Partnership (TTIP), which will give all power to global corporations
and destroy our cherished NHS.
The party
says that the EU is not an issue that resonates on doorsteps, and that is true. But issues related to the EU often do.
For example the way in which house prices in central London have rocketed as a result of overseas buyers buying new homes and leaving them empty. Denmark negotiated an opt out on foreign ownership of homes as a result if which you have to be a Danish citizen in order to own property in Denmark.
For example the way in which house prices in central London have rocketed as a result of overseas buyers buying new homes and leaving them empty. Denmark negotiated an opt out on foreign ownership of homes as a result if which you have to be a Danish citizen in order to own property in Denmark.
People are also concerned about the free
movement of capital and labour, not because they fear outsiders, but because they
fear that free movement benefits the rich and powerful and not communities like
the car workers in Hampshire whose jobs were outsourced to Turkey with the aid
of an EU grant.
It is, to say the least ,odd that EU membership means that our
immigration policy privileges ‘EU citizens’ over West Indians, Indians or New
Zealanders. Yet it is often those who are Eurosceptic who are accused of being
racist.
How can
it be right that Scotland gets to vote on their constitutional relationship
with the rest of the UK, yet the UK as whole is denied a referendum on our
constitutional relationship with the EU? Before anyone says we had such a
referendum in 1975, that was on the EEC not the EU.
Uncritical
support of the EU has now become an article of faith for many Labour
representatives and activists, but surely we should embrace a little more
scepticism if we are to reflect public opinion?
And, at the very least, we should embrace an in/out referendum both to demonstrate our democratic credentials and to wrong foot the Tories who have set and arbitrary date for a referendum.
And, at the very least, we should embrace an in/out referendum both to demonstrate our democratic credentials and to wrong foot the Tories who have set and arbitrary date for a referendum.
It’s good that Ed is promising a referendum in the event of any
further transfer of power to the EU. But many remember that we were promised a
referendum on the EU constitution, aka the Lisbon Treaty.
I fear that if we
continue to be seen on the side of the undemocratic EU elite, then it won’t just
be the Tories who lose support to UKIP.
No comments:
Post a Comment